GMX
GMX
GMX ✓ VerifiedPrice
—
24h
—
Mkt cap
—
Volume
—
We read this asset as:Cash-flow lensFees accrue to token holders — read via P/F, P/S and premium.
Verdict
Fee data building
As of 2026-06-30 · latest · 30-day annualized
Premium (peer percentile · 0 explained → 100 unexplained)
Premium — building
Premium decomposition (price vs holder cash flow) needs our own on-chain fee data, which we are building. Until then we show price, supply, and on-chain identity.
4Overview
Perpetuals and swaps (Arbitrum, Avalanche). Revenue buys back GMX, which is then staked (staker distribution temporarily paused).
5Official links & addresses
GMX Token (Arbitrum)0xfc5A1A6EB076a2C7aD06eD22C90d7E710E35ad0a ✅
GLP Manager0x321F653eED006AD1C29D174e17d96351BDe22649 ✅
Vault V10x489ee077994B6658eAfA855C308275EAd8097C4A ✅ target of 2025.07 exploit
Treasury / governance multisig no single confirmed treasury address is published
Trust official addresses only — beware impersonator tokens
Share this asset
6Market · supply
no garnish data (not fetched)
Full data & breakdownon-chain · events · derivatives · peers · governance · risk — expand for the institutional detail
7On-chain · holders
data wiring — next increment
9Futures · derivatives
Derivatives data (open interest, funding) is N/A. Perpetual/futures feeds require a commercial market-data subscription we don't use, so we show N/A rather than an unverified number. Methodology →
10Protocol fundamentals
Cash-flow metrics do not apply under this lens.
11On-chain value ratios
Cash-flow metrics do not apply under this lens.
12Governance · development
on-chain governance — not on Snapshot
13News · narrative · timeline
2021launch (Arbitrum, later Avalanche)
2023.08V2
2025.07.09V1 exploit
14Peer comparison
Cash-flow metrics do not apply under this lens.
15Risk · quality
AuditABDK and others (docs.gmx.io → Audits). ✅
Exploit history2025.07.09 GMX V1 ~$42M (Arbitrum) — reentrancy in executeDecreaseOrder + a GLP AUM accounting desync. V2 unaffected. Attacker returned most funds; $44M paid to GLP holders. A clear contract reentrancy flaw.
Centralization notesTimelock + multisig. A keeper (order-keeper) privilege exists — the exploit touched this trust boundary. Price feeds depend on keepers/Chainlink.
16Our metrics over time
No trend metric for this lens yet.
On-chain owned coverage
Not yet computed from our own RPC. For cash-flow assets without our own fee data yet, the premium decomposition is shown as building — never a fake number.